Lucknow bench of the High Court dated 08.12.2014 yesterday shikshamitra brother Mohammed Arshd Ncte case I have to finish it after reading the counter to the fact that she appeared worthy of praise and effective seal. State education is not only friends in all the legal provisions laid with your opinion which you can learn what type of education to the High Court is eliminated friends .. NCTE the counter from 1 to 28 point which I have proved to myself what a friend is education? I am writing these few key points 1 Point number 4 is considered to be obvious to friends of education 05/26/1999 I only engagement (contract) was placed on the 11-month point, the government argues Done This paragraph he is a teacher. 2-point 5 and 6 of the studies I've NCTE friend appoint the obvious place at the Gram Panchayat level and village head, after the recommendation of the head teacher, etc. The final selection was I headed to district officials. From this point follow the rules of the government, and in 1981 was admitted to the teacher as too Rules 1981 have the power to possess basic education. These arguments were dismissed appointed teacher education untrained friend. 3-Point No. 9 of the work I have said education friends 15/06/07 was the order of the studies I've told friends a holiday to get higher education as too would not be able to leave the contract workers. From the point of rejecting the government's argument B is legal to keep education friend 4-Point Number 10, I have been obvious by NCTE teacher education legal right to become friends as too were on that 11-month contract and received his bachelor's degree at minimum competency level is not correct Tate and government and education friends Dismissing the argument will be the regular degree holders Masab Point 5 of 11 studies I have written to friends prior to the introduction of Bt C RTE ACT 2009 is therefore wrong to discount them. While many regular people with similar qualifications stripe BT different rules may be adopted by the government dismissed these arguments (education friends) will be given preference. 6-Point No. 12 and 13 of the NCTE wrote a very valuable training UP government education friends wrote 03/01/2011 Draft letter NCTE 13 th point I wrote a letter to the Government I was told that since we are training teachers make them helpful The government argues this point clear leaf dropout and training of education from friends of friends finished the studies .. 7- point 14, 15,16,17 I wrote clear the Government Gazette of the Academic institution NCTE and education sub-section 1 of section 23 of Act I is written clearly set minimum qualifications will NCTE government dismissed the argument Tate and their training is to perforation. The whole point of this is over Itihahi 8-point 19 of the RTE ACT HRD AND I wrote Clear all organizations advice and suggestions from the Ministry of Law and has decided to appoint a qualified teacher and RTE ACT Casey mentioned in Section 35 of the RTE Act, Section 23 of the provision (2) Casey will be implemented to write and let me tell you a minimum qualification of the NCTE and Central Ave. State graduate has the authority to waive the two I did not graduate from Tate Tate exemption then I would anyway. The government has rejected all the arguments here and had made clear the field of education friends. 9-point, 20 I distinctly worthy of writing can not be compromised because a living I Sicshako primary elections and psychological and technical difficulties faced by teachers in junior handling is taken to test the ability of anyone to examine Tate discounts can not. 10-point number 25, which I refer to the letter 03/01/2011 wrote the first time. The clear answer is written in the state education NCTE friends can not accept regular education as too NCTE friend were working on 11-month contract and clear is the point of a regular teacher has been considered in other states who graduate they can only be Lagya Haljoki and Tate have been up so I do not have no friends Milegasrkar of studies on which that letter was Treningadharit was not thinking home Kerhe Sunyab education friend or ferries. Minimum 11-point number 26, I've been writing clear merit I sub-section 2 of section 23 of the RTE Act, I have left it to the right center for five years from the publication of the Gazette Hirajy Asamvedhanik he millet friends who have left education. The government plans to demolish Kisbi Notification No. 23 of the center 12-point / 08/2010, issued by the State Gazette I 29/07/2011, changes have been studies to gain friends she is Asamvedhanik opposes the NCTE. Clear the field of government, the plan collapsed --


.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
this news by rtc2009 group
Keyword ;Shikshamitron, Advertisement, Carrier Concealer, Shikshamitra appointment High Court orde